21st CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: Millennial Chick Can’t Stop Having Sex with Trump Supporters.
From the Comments:
Another Comment (in shocking bad taste!)
21st CENTURY RELATIONSHIPS: Millennial Chick Can’t Stop Having Sex with Trump Supporters.
From the Comments:
Another Comment (in shocking bad taste!)
From Jerry’s son Alex:
I’m afraid that Jerry passed away
We had a great time at DragonCon
He did not suffer.
The last lines of his last post on his blog “Chaos Manor” :
More later I’m experiencing a wave of nausea.
Bye for now.
Bye! May we meet again.
(July? Funny how none of the MSM coverage I’ve watched mentions the date that this incident took place.)
By Jamie Wells, M.D. — September 1, 2017A disturbing video (start at minute 4:55) went viral of Utah nurse Alex Wubbels being handcuffed, while screaming as she tried to do her job. The images obtained from University Hospital and Detective Jeff Payne’s body cameras reveal the standoff. At issue: if the police officer could obtain a blood sample from her patient who was hurt from a July 26 collision that involved a fatality.
In an ironic twist, as the nurse painstakingly endeavors not to violate the rights of her patient she ultimately is handcuffed screaming, “You are assaulting me! Help!”
Nurse Wubbels contended that she was not permitted to take blood from an unconscious patient unless these conditions were met: 1) the patient was under arrest, 2) the officer had a warrant, 3) the patient consented. For obvious reasons, a medical professional cannot achieve informed consent of an impaired patient and the other mandates were not realized which the detective acknowledged.
..
Karra Porter, a Salt Lake City attorney representing Wubbels, noted to the media ““implied consent” (as claimed by the Detective) has not been the law in Utah since 2007, and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2016 that the Constitution permits warrantless breath tests in drunken-driving arrests, but not warrantless blood tests. She stressed that the patient was always considered the victim in the case and never was suspected of wrongdoing.”
…
The video is upsetting to watch given the clear devotion to patient care of burn unit nurse Wubbels. The battles healthcare professionals face extend well beyond high volumes, increased regulations, and the nature of patient care itself. This unfortunate event demonstrates what is fundamentally at odds with a provider delivering care and that of law enforcement. That nurse beyond the hospital policies and Utah laws is ethically responsible for being a fierce advocate for her patient. Her duty is to her patient, not even the hospital or the police. Performing a procedure without consent would place her into the realm of commiting assault and battery. Her oath and the requirements of her profession dictate the highest standard. These are universal no matter the patient. The rules and principles don’t change no matter the identity of the patient or even in this case where it appears the police wanted to clear the patient with that sample.
The MSM have picked up on this story…Now. But this story and the behavior of the detective would have gone unremarked on or investigated but for the release of the video by social media. Not by the TV, or the Newspapers. There was no investigation nor was there any disciplinary action taken against the detective until the video went viral. Having been caught literally ‘sweeping the story under the rug”, the Mayor and Police Commissioner needed the MSM to downplay or stand mute on the timing of any action on their part.
As to the (defensive) statement that the police officer was drawing blood to “exonerate” the unconscious patient, says who? Especially since that excuse came up after the uproar over the nurse’s arrest.
Following an ‘high-speed chase’ that is itself under investigation for following the policy on such chases on crowded roads, the suspect in that chase lost control (crossed the center line) and crashed (front-end to front-end) into the commercial truck driven by the patient. What exactly did the patient need to be ‘exonerated’ for?
But the police, possibly facing expensive lawsuits, had a strong inclination to ‘find’ evidence of illegal substances in the blood of the patient.
However, under that set of circumstances, the blood draw AND TESTING should
be done by an unbiased agency, i.e. a warrant requesting the hospital
perform the draw and test the blood. Chain of evidence passing through
the hands of a interested party (The Police), in a situation where the
police department or it’s members stood a chance of legal or civil
charges that could be negated if (somehow) something showed up in the blood of the patient. That’s what this nurse MIGHT have prevented.
The cop was certainly irate over something. Very irate. Very.
An old salesman joke: A salesman says, “We sell below cost.” A customer asks how he can do that. “Simple,” he says. “We buy below cost.”
For a day or so last week, Jeff Bezos passed Bill Gates as the richest man in the world. And that’s pretty much how he did it.
Bezos runs Amazon, which is primarily a shipping business. It relies on the U.S. Postal Service to deliver two-thirds of its packages. In many places now, it locates a depot near a post office, presorts the packages, and delivers them to the post office. The Postal Service, which has a monopoly on last-mile delivery, does the rest.
…
Since 2007, the Postal Service has been required to allocate 5.5 percent of its fixed costs to package delivery and to incorporate that into its pricing. That figure made sense then, but today, 25 percent of the Postal Service’s business is package delivery. And thanks to features of the Amazon deal – such as Sunday delivery, grocery delivery, even delivery from fish markets to local restaurants – the expenses have climbed.
In fact, they’ve climbed so much, according to a recent analysis by Citigroup, that the Postal Service should be charging Amazon $1.46 more per package than the $2 or so it does now. “Amazon now enjoys low rates unavailable to its competitors,” the Journal story said. “It’s as if Amazon gets a subsidized space on every mail truck.”
Jeff Bezos becomes the worlds wealthiest man, as the rest of us get poorer. Local jobs that disappear when the locals can’t compete with Amazon. Whole industries shut down when Amazon floods their niche with Chinese made crap. (and it is crap, mostly)
Bezos is a Globalist that supports the progressives and this ‘sweetheart’ deal got started during Obama’s long reign. During which Bezos bought the Washington Post which continues to support the progressive line. Funny that none of the cost cutters in Congress are blowing the whistle on this. Is this deal part of Bezos’s payoff?
Agree or disagree, as you wish. Just don’t talk about this around Alexa.
THE LADY SAYS: FIX IT WITH A HAMMER “This is good.”
WRITTEN BY A 21 YEAR OLD FEMALE.
Wow, this girl has a great plan! Love the last thing she would do the best.
This was written by a 21 yr. old female who gets it. It’s her future she’s worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she’s being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.
This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco, TX.
PUT ME IN CHARGE . .
Put me in charge of food stamps..no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.
Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.
Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your “home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.
In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good.”
Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self-esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem
If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.
I love this one..
AND while you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.
Now, if you have the guts – PASS IT ON…
Isn’t it weird that in AMERICA our flag and our culture offend so many people…… but our benefits don’t?

.@AntifaBoston Your mommy called. Your wash is done and she made your bed. Cookies and milk in the fridge.
She left some homework for you to do..define the word fascist..then look in the mirror for an exsmple
They (Democrats) really, really don’t want anyone looking closely at vote fraud. They claim there is none of any significance.
That must be why this report from Chicago City Wire has been so thoroughly ignored by the mainstream media:
More than 14,000 votes were cast in Chicago during the 2016 general election than there were voters to cast them, based on separate figures released by the Chicago Board of Elections, the chairman of the Chicago Republican Party has reported.
Chris Cleveland told the Chicago Wire that “on a whim,” he filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the board, which provided him with a list of 1,101,178 people who voted in the general election. An earlier post on the board’s website said that 1,115,664 votes had been cast.
“There should be never be more votes than voters,” Cleveland said. “Every ballot cast should be recorded against a registered voter.”
The party did a breakdown of voting by precinct, and Cleveland said it found an uneven distribution of discrepancies. Fifteen precincts had 100 more ballots cast than voters, while others had fewer votes than voters.
Judicial Watch is also on the case:
Washington-based Judicial Watch named Illinois among 11 states that have another kind of discrepancy in their voting rolls: The number of registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens as determined by a review of Census data.
In April, the group sent a notice-of-violation letter along with a threat to sue the 11 states.
Robert Popper, director of Judicial Watch’s Election Integrity Project and formerly deputy chief of the voting section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department, said that not maintaining accurate voting rolls violates the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.
“People remember the act as the ‘motor voter’ law because it requires the states to offer voter registration forms with driver license applications,” Popper said. “But what a lot of people forget is that as a compromise for getting the act through, it requires states to maintain accurate voting rolls.”
Judicial Watch identified 26 Illinois counties where voter registration was higher than the number of people eligible to vote, according to Census numbers.
And from the comments…
At least one law enforcement officer in Charlottesville, VA has come forward to clear his conscience and reveal the truth — or at least his version of it — that what went down in the city was not only condoned by city governance but was intentional, orchestrated and may have been planned as long ago as May.
The as-yet unidentified police officer has said that the Charlottesville P.D. were specifically instructed to bring the radical left and right wing groups together to instigate violence and then to told to “stand down” once violence ensued in a deliberate effort to ignite a race riot.
…The man accused of being a neo-Nazi and murdering a woman by deliberately driving into her during protests in Charlottesville is in reality a supporter of Hillary Clinton and member of Antifa in receipt of funding by George Soros.
Brennan Gilmore was the first man “on the scene” and was the author of the first viral tweet about Charlottesville. He was later interviewed by MSNBC. He was presented as an accidental witness. But who is he really?
Gilmore worked in Africa as a State Department foreign officer under Hillary Clinton. The New York Times mentioned this “coincidence” – and then later deleted it. Brennan Gilmore was also involved with the Kony hoax in 2012, and he is currently Chief of Staff for Tom Perrielo, who is running for Governor of Virginia and received $380k from George Soros.
So the first man on the scene, whose tweet went viral, and who was later interviewed on mainstream news as a witness, just happened to be a State Department insider with a long history of involvement in psy-ops? If you think this isn’t fishy, how about this – since the Charlottesville protests and his appearance in the media, his information was suddenly removed from State Department websites.”
Is this all true? I don’t know. The article supplies little documentation or links to unbiased sites for substantiation. But if the Governor, Mayor and police were complicit in a true ‘False Flag’ operation then until the Feds come in and investigate there wouldn’t be. It seems to fit the many sources of eyewitness reports and iphone video that have come out.
It would really help now if President Trump had been able to get most of his appointees confirmed by the Senate, wouldn’t it? As it is there are too many Obama holdovers left in the walls for me to see much traction in the investigation.
To me the one piece of indisputable evidence is the security arrangements made by the police, clearly funneling the two groups of protestors together, along with the clear fact that the police did in fact stand aside and allow the Right to be severely beaten by the Antifa thugs.
It is very hard to believe that the Democrats (Any Democrat!) would go this far. If so then one side is already started a Civil War.