Litigious Canadian Tranny Puts Another Salon Out of Business By Demanding the Female Workers Give Him a Brazilian On His Penis; He Claims He’s a Woman Being Discriminated Against and Files a Complaint with Canada’s Tranny Supremacy Committee.

We’ve moved on from “Bake my cake!” to “Wax my balls!”

— Chris McKeever (@TheRealMcKeever) July 20, 2019

This man in a Party City wig has previously gotten other women — many of them immigrants — to shut down their salons for the crime of refusing to touch a mentally insane man’s pud.

A born male who identifies as female, and whose male genitalia is still intact, is suing female-only waxers on the basis that their refusal to wax his bollocks — sorry, her bollocks — is an act of discrimination. Yes, this person believes that because he identifies as female he should therefore have access to every female service, including the most intimate female services. Any female beautician who refuses to tend to his testicles is being ‘transphobic,’ apparently, because they are denying his womanhood. Even though he has a penis. And testicles. And is a man. That’s hate speech, I know.

This is the case of Jessica Yaniv, born Jonathan Yaniv, who has filed complaints against more than a dozen female waxers with the Human Rights Council (HRC) in British Columbia. Yaniv claims that the women’s refusal to give him a Brazilian– that is, to handle his penis and testicles and to remove his pubic hair, activities these women did not want to carry out — is discrimination. Yaniv says that self-identifying as a woman is sufficient to be treated as a woman and to get access to services typically reserved for women. In the words of the National Post, the HRC hearings revolve around the question, ‘Should a business be allowed to deny service on the basis of gender identity?’ Or perhaps, ‘Should a woman be forced by law to touch a penis she doesn’t want to touch?’ — that’s a franker, more honest way of putting it, though it’s obvious why people don’t put it like that, given it would expose the fundamental misogyny at play in this demented case.

…

You can now be a bigot simply for believing in reality itself, in this case that people with penises are not women. Pressuring women to handle male genitalia against their will is dreadful and it suggests woke politics has now crossed the line from irritating to disgusting.