Interesting video on video.

I find this very interesting, on several levels.

Here are the Armed Attorney’s with a video on, well, videos.

Unknown's avatar

About On the North River

Forty years toiled in the Tel-com industry, married for 36 years widowed at sixty-one. Ten years in a relationship with a woman until her death. Was a Tea Party supporter. Today a follower of the Last American President to be honestly elected, Donald J. Trump. Recently had Ancestry.com tell me I'm Swedish, not Danish. I may need to change my avatar.
This entry was posted in 2023, Still not a gun blog, YouTube. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Interesting video on video.

  1. Dan's avatar Dan says:

    Nothing wrong with cameras…as long as YOU own them and YOU control if and when the cops see the video. Cameras from Ring and other internet based companies OWN any video the camera sees. You can’t control what happens to that video. But if you buy and set up cameras and don’t allow them access to the internet but simply record what they see you can decide if you want that video released to the courts. If you don’t you erase it BEFORE you receive a subpoena for it. Then simply tell the court you erased it..before they asked for it. No crime doing that. But yes…if a DA can use YOUR video to imprison you they WILL do so. Prosecutors are NOT interested in justice. All they care about is their conviction rate. If an innocent person is convicted of something…oh well. Tough.

    Like

    • All true. The problem is finding a camera that isn’t made to connect to the internet. Or an App for the camera that isn’t written in China and that App will demand complete access and rights before it will operate at all.

      So for me, for now. No cameras.

      Like

Leave a reply to Dan Cancel reply