Georgia, DC, Pennsylvania… did I miss any?
For those that are kind enough to follow this blog you may have picked up that I completely support the past, and future presidency of Donald Trump. And yet I’ve posted very little on the legal attacks he has endured the last year.
Frankly I have reached that level of disgust and contempt for the twisting and manipulation of the justice system that I can’t even dignify it’s misuse with my poor commentary.
But then there’s Dershowitz…
DERSHOWITZ: If the government fails to prove Trump’s state of mind beyond a reasonable doubt, the indictment against him may well backfire – politically. He may gain rather than lose support among independents and marginal supporters who oppose the weaponization of our criminal justice system.
But perhaps, most notably, Smith’s case against Trump is novel, untested and unique. It may collapse under its own weight. Our Constitution prohibits ex post facto prosecutions – that is prosecutions that are not based on clear rules easily knowable to defendants at the time of the alleged offenses.
Put simply, the law must be clearly established by firm precedents. There are few in this indictment. As Thomas Jefferson once put it: the criminal law must be so clear that the average person can understand it if he ‘reads it while running.’ The spirit, if not the letter of this prohibition is violated when statutes are stretched and precedents are ignored.
On the North River 
The criminals in charge simply DO NOT CARE what us peons think about Trump or their politically motivated pogrom against him. Why should they. There is NOTHING WE CAN DO about it…at least not legally or peacefully. They want him dead or in prison….where they can EASILY have him killed. And they WILL get what they want eventually. And there isn’t a DAMN THING anyone can do to prevent it.
LikeLike
“John Adams please pick up the white courtesy phone, Mr. Adams the white courtesy phone, please”.
LikeLike