New info on Libya, but can it be believed?

CIA Takes Heat for Role in Libya

As the wizard said, “That’s a horse of a different color that is!”.

So, according to the WSJ today the Benghazi consulate was nothing more than a front for a CIA operation. (???)  The way the article is written makes it sound like the US Ambassador was nothing more than protective coloring.  The timeline of his death gets no mention or analysis in the article.

In the comments on the article the majority seem to agree, was it a check or did the writers of this piece insist on cash from Hilary’s State Department?

This totally illogical story ignores the cables from Ambassador Stevens requesting additional security.  It seems as though the ambassador thought he was in command in Benghazi, didn’t he get the memo? Additionally the Jihadists seemed to focus on the (perhaps accidental) killing of the ambassador followed by the parading of his corpse through the streets, Whoa guys! Dude is just a figurehead, your target is the CIA, remember?

Sorry. This story is a joke, it clears up nothing and ignores all inconvenient facts. Sure tries to exonerate the White House though.

If lies were grease, Barry would be certain to slide back into another four years.

Unknown's avatar

About On the North River

Forty years toiled in the Tel-com industry, married for 36 years widowed at sixty-one. Ten years in a relationship with a woman until her death. Was a Tea Party supporter. Today a follower of the Last American President to be honestly elected, Donald J. Trump. Recently had Ancestry.com tell me I'm Swedish, not Danish. I may need to change my avatar.
This entry was posted in 2012, All the News not fit to print., News and opinion, Time to talk a little treason, When Progressives Attack. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply but please keep it Legal.